James Webb Space Telescope spies on rocky TRAPPIST-1 exoplanet, finds bad news for life

artist's illustration of the exoplanet trappist-1c, with its dim red dwarf host star in the background
Observations by the James Webb Space Telescope of TRAPPIST-1 c — the second of seven known planets in the TRAPPIST-1 system, seen here in an artist’s illustration — suggests the rocky world has either a very thin carbon dioxide atmosphere or none at all. (Image credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, Joseph Olmsted (STScI))

New data from NASA's James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) shows that the atmosphere of a rocky exoplanet in the TRAPPIST-1 system is either non-existent or incredibly thin, making it unfavorable for hosting life as we know it. 

Astronomers using JWST were able to calculate the amount of heat energy coming from TRAPPIST-1 c, revealing that the dayside temperature of the rocky world is about 225 degrees Fahrenheit (107 degrees Celsius) — the coolest rocky exoplanet ever characterized. At this temperature, the exoplanet's atmosphere is likely extremely thin, if it exists at all, according to a statement from NASA. 

Located 40 light-years from Earth, TRAPPIST-1 c is one of seven rocky planets orbiting an ultracool red dwarf star, the most common type of star found in our Milky Way galaxy. Therefore, studying this exoplanet system helps astronomers better understand if these types of stars can host worlds able to support life as we know it here on Earth. 

Related: James Webb Space Telescope — A complete guide

"We want to know if rocky planets have atmospheres or not," Sebastian Zieba, first author of a new study announcing the results and a graduate student at the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy in Germany, said in the NASA statement

"In the past, we could only really study planets with thick, hydrogen-rich atmospheres," Zieba said. "With Webb, we can finally start to search for atmospheres dominated by oxygen, nitrogen and carbon dioxide."

While the worlds orbiting TRAPPIST-1 are similar in size and mass to the inner, rocky planets in our own solar system, the composition of the exoplanets' atmospheres remains unclear. That's where JWST comes in: The telescope's powerful Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI) helps astronomers characterize rocky exoplanets, such as TRAPPIST-1 c. 

Initially, astronomers thought TRAPPIST-1 c might have a thick carbon dioxide atmosphere like Venus, given it is about the same size and receives a similar amount of radiation from its host star as Venus gets from the sun. However, red dwarf stars like TRAPPIST-1 emit bright X-ray and ultraviolet radiation that can easily strip away a planet's atmosphere. It's also possible that, at the time the exoplanet formed, there was not enough water, carbon dioxide and other volatiles available to make an atmosphere, according to the statement. 

Using MIRI, the research team compared the brightness of light emitted by TRAPPIST-1 c as it moved behind its host star to when the planet was beside the star. By doing this, the team was able to calculate the amount of mid-infrared light emitted by the planet, which is directly related to its temperature and, in turn, its atmospheric composition. The emissions observed from TRAPPIST-1 c suggest a lack of carbon dioxide gas that would have otherwise absorbed the light coming from the planet. 

"Our results are consistent with the planet being a bare rock with no atmosphere, or the planet having a really thin CO2 atmosphere (thinner than on Earth or even Mars) with no clouds," Zieba said in the statement. 

Given that TRAPPIST-1 c lacks a thick atmosphere, the astronomers suggest that it may have formed with relatively little water, or any of the other components necessary to make the planet habitable. 

"It is extraordinary that we can measure this," study co-author Laura Kreidberg, also of the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, said in the statement. "There have been questions for decades now about whether rocky planets can keep atmospheres. Webb's ability really brings us into a regime where we can start to compare exoplanet systems to our solar system in a way that we never have before."

The new findings were published June 19 in the journal Nature. 

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.

Samantha Mathewson
Contributing Writer

Samantha Mathewson joined Space.com as an intern in the summer of 2016. She received a B.A. in Journalism and Environmental Science at the University of New Haven, in Connecticut. Previously, her work has been published in Nature World News. When not writing or reading about science, Samantha enjoys traveling to new places and taking photos! You can follow her on Twitter @Sam_Ashley13. 

  • rod
    "TRAPPIST-1 c likely has an incredibly thin atmosphere, or no atmosphere at all."

    My note. The exoplanet.eu site updated various properties for this exoplanet now. http://exoplanet.eu/catalog/trappist-1_c/
    Another site reported on TRAPPIST-1 c too. https://phys.org/news/2023-06-webb-thick-carbon-dioxide-atmosphere.html
    My observation. This looks important concerning TRAPPIST-1, 7 exoplanet system in the phys.org report. “The absence of a thick atmosphere suggests that the planet may have formed with relatively little water. If the cooler, more temperate TRAPPIST-1 planets formed under similar conditions, they too may have started with little of the water and other components necessary to make a planet habitable."

    Ref - No thick carbon dioxide atmosphere on the rocky exoplanet TRAPPIST-1 c, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06232-z, 19-June-2023. "...A Venus-analogue atmosphere with sulfuric acid clouds is also disfavoured at 2.6σ confidence. Thinner atmospheres or bare-rock surfaces are consistent with our measured planet-to-star flux ratio. The absence of a thick, CO2-rich atmosphere on TRAPPIST-1 c suggests a relatively volatile-poor formation history, with less than 9.5+7.5−2.3 Earth oceans of water. If all planets in the system formed in the same way, this would indicate a limited reservoir of volatiles for the potentially habitable planets in the system."

    I keep seeing periodic references now to Venus like or Venus type exoplanets, the space.com article pointed this out about TRAPPIST-1 c too. "Initially, astronomers thought TRAPPIST-1 c might have a thick carbon dioxide atmosphere like Venus, given it is about the same size and receives a similar amount of radiation from its host star as Venus gets from the sun."

    Apparently evolutionary modeling for these exoplanets and confirming atmospheres remains challenging. Here is another possible Venus analog but likely very different too.

    Exoplanet may reveal secrets about the edge of habitability, https://phys.org/news/2023-06-exoplanet-reveal-secrets-edge-habitability.html
    "Super-Earth" LP 890-9c (also named SPECULOOS-2c) is providing important insights about conditions at the inner edge of a star's habitable zone and why Earth and Venus developed so differently, according to new research led by Lisa Kaltenegger, associate professor of astronomy at Cornell University. Her team found LP 890-9c, which orbits close to the inner edge of its solar system's habitable zone, would look vastly different depending on whether it still had warm oceans, a steam atmosphere, or if it had lost its water—assuming it once had oceans like Earth's. "Looking at this planet will tell us what's happening on this inner edge of the habitable zone—how long a rocky planet can maintain habitability when it starts to get hot," Kaltenegger said. "It will teach us something fundamental about how rocky planets evolve with increasing starlight, and about what will one day happen to us and Earth."

    Concerning the space.com report on TRAPPIST-1 c: "New data from NASA's James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) shows that the atmosphere of a rocky exoplanet in the TRAPPIST-1 system is either non-existent or incredibly thin, making it unfavorable for hosting life as we know it."

    It seems as more studies and investigations are done, many exoplanets appear hostile to life, life as we see here on Earth.
    Reply